State v. Barrett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a sentencing court can consider conduct that did not result in criminal convictions
• defendant’s admitted history of sexually abusing young women could be considered “persistent involvement” even in the absence of criminal convictions
• “even in the absence of criminal convictions,” the defen- dant’s history of sexually abusing young women, established by testimony about the defendant’s admissions, warranted a departure sentence based on persistent involvement
• uncharged conduct detailed in the presentencing report

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cam
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-02-06· cited 11×
• State v. Loud
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-07-16· cited 10×
• State v. Reeves
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-04-26· cited 8×
• State v. Cannon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-07-26· cited 4×
• State v. Summerlyn
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-12-08· cited 2×
• State v. Greenough
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-08-07

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Adams
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-02-11· cited 83×
• State v. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-02-12· cited 80×
• State v. Kephart
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-12-16· cited 54×
• State v. Johnston
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-05-12· cited 42×
• State v. Martin
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-12-16· cited 24×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-02-22· cited 15×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-10-26· cited 7×
• In Re Conduct of King
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-11-17· cited 6×
• State v. Barrett
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-01-27· cited 1×