Skip to main content

State v. Barnett

Citations

  • 784 S.E.2d 188
  • 245 N.C. App. 101
  • 2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 99

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that the fact that the witness and her daughter did not receive the threatening letters was “irrelevant”
  • reasoning that the fact that the witness and her daughter did not receive the threatening letters was “irrelevant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Inman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.