Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 1/19/2016
State v. Barnett
Citations
- 784 S.E.2d 188
- 245 N.C. App. 101
- 2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 99
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that the fact that the witness and her daughter did not receive the threatening letters was “irrelevant”
- reasoning that the fact that the witness and her daughter did not receive the threatening letters was “irrelevant”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Inman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.