Ohio Court of Appeals· 11/6/2020

State v. Barnard

Citations

2020 Ohio 5204

Syllabus

Anders appeal. The trial court made all the required consecutive-sentence findings at the sentencing hearing, and we cannot clearly and convincingly find that the record failed to support the trial court's findings. Upon review of the record, there are no arguably meritorious claims for review. Judgments affirmed.

Judges: Donovan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Anders v. California
Supreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
Penson v. Ohio
Supreme Court· 1988-11-29· cited 13,912×
State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
State v. Withrow
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-06· cited 72×
State v. Allen
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-05· cited 10×
State v. Anderson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-14· cited 5×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.