State v. Barklind

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in absence of a recoupment statute, defendant required to reimburse county for a portion of his court-appointed attorney’s fees
• in absence of a recoupment statute, defendant required to reimburse county for a portion of his court-appointed attorney's fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lenihan
  Montana Supreme Court· 1979-11-21· cited 189×
• State v. Barklind
  Washington Supreme Court· 1976-12-16· cited 43×
• State v. Rogers
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1977-03-16· cited 39×
• Simmons v. James
  D. Kansas· 1979-03-30· cited 4×
• State v. Angulo
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-05-01· cited 3×
• State v. Walker
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1980-10-27· cited 3×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Fuller v. Oregon
  Supreme Court· 1974-05-20· cited 365×
• James v. Strange
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 286×
• Decker v. Decker
  Washington Supreme Court· 1958-06-05· cited 49×
• State Ex Rel. Woodhouse v. Dore
  Washington Supreme Court· 1966-07-14· cited 45×
• State Ex Rel. Brundage v. Eide
  Washington Supreme Court· 1974-04-25· cited 28×
• Bronson v. Syverson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1915-11-22· cited 26×
• In re Milecke
  Washington Supreme Court· 1909-03-27· cited 20×
• State v. Higgins
  Washington Supreme Court· 1965-10-21· cited 10×
• State v. Langford
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1974-12-10· cited 8×
• Colby v. Backus
  Washington Supreme Court· 1898-05-20· cited 4×