State v. Barkley
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 2830
Syllabus
Crim.R. 32.1 presentence motion to withdraw a guilty plea abuse of discretion. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying the appellant's Crim.R. 32.1 presentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The trial court conducted a complete and impartial hearing on the motion and gave full and fair consideration to the plea withdrawal request. Appellant was represented by highly competent counsel, he expressed his satisfaction with trial counsel at the time of his plea, and he voluntarily chose to accept a favorable plea deal.
Judges: S. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. XieOhio Supreme Court· 1992-02-12· cited 1,682×
- Wayne Ernest Barker v. United States of America, United States of America v. Wayne Ernest BarkerTenth Circuit· 1978-07-12· cited 182×
- State v. DavnerCourt of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County· 2017-12-07· cited 29×
- State v. HinesOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-02-27· cited 15×
- State v. BradleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-01-09· cited 3×
- State v. ArmstrongOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-10· cited 2×
- State v. ParkerOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-12· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.