State v. Barker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because the State was unable to demonstrate either compelling circumstances to warrant such a lengthy delay, or that it diligently pursued bringing Barker’s case to trial, we conclude that, in this instance, the delay weighs heavily against the State.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ariegwe
  Montana Supreme Court· 2007-08-16· cited 190×
• City of Billings v. Bruce
  Montana Supreme Court· 1998-07-29· cited 93×
• State v. Matthews
  Montana Supreme Court· 1995-04-18· cited 20×
• State v. Blair
  Montana Supreme Court· 2004-12-16· cited 16×
• State v. Atkins
  Montana Supreme Court· 1996-06-25· cited 8×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Barker v. Wingo
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
• Strunk v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1973-06-11· cited 675×
• State ex rel. Briceno v. District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District ex rel. County of Yellowstone
  Montana Supreme Court· 1977-08-18· cited 44×
• State v. Curtis
  Montana Supreme Court· 1990-02-09· cited 36×
• State v. Hembd
  Montana Supreme Court· 1992-09-01· cited 33×
• State v. Hall
  Montana Supreme Court· 1990-08-20· cited 26×
• State v. Van Voast
  Montana Supreme Court· 1991-02-12· cited 19×
• State v. Scott
  Montana Supreme Court· 1993-04-01· cited 17×
• State v. Wombolt
  Montana Supreme Court· 1988-04-21· cited 16×
• State v. Heffernan
  Montana Supreme Court· 1991-04-04· cited 16×