State v. Barker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[It is] the presupposition of our law to resolve doubts in the enforcement of the penal code against the imposition of a harsher punishment.\
• \[It is] the presupposition of our law to resolve doubts in the enforcement of the penal code against the imposition of a harsher punishment.\
• “[A] single larcenous taking of property, whether owned by one or several individuals, will be treated as a single criminal offense.”
• “[A] 13 single larcenous taking of property, whether owned by one or several individuals, will be treated as a single criminal offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Frampton
  Utah Supreme Court· 1987-04-09· cited 78×
• State of West Virginia v. Gina Marie Jerrome
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2014-05-08· cited 32×
• People v. Perlstein
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-10-17· cited 20×
• State v. Rasabout and Kaykeo
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2013-03-21· cited 17×
• State v. Bell
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2016-07-21· cited 11×
• State v. Bradshaw
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2004-09-10· cited 9×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bell v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1955-05-09· cited 1,300×
• State v. Warren
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1893-03-14· cited 40×
• State v. Maggard
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1901-02-26· cited 15×
• State v. Bolen
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1976-01-13· cited 12×
• State v. Mickel
  Utah Supreme Court· 1901-06-07· cited 9×