State v. Barden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• internal asserted that he did not have warts and thus it was unlikely that he caused the victim’s wart goes to the weight of the evidence, which is ultimately a matter for the jury. Nonprecedential Memo Op: 344 Or App 594 (2025
• internal asserted that he did not have warts and thus it was unlikely that he caused the victim’s wart goes to the weight of the evidence, which is ultimately a matter for the jury. Nonprecedential Memo Op: 344 Or App 594 (2025
• internal asserted that he did not have warts and thus it was unlikely that he caused the victim’s wart goes to the weight of the evidence, which is ultimately a matter for the jury. Nonprecedential Memo Op: 344 Or App 594 (2025) 599 quotation marks omitted
• internal asserted that he did not have warts and thus it was unlikely that he caused the victim’s wart goes to the weight of the evidence, which is ultimately a matter for the jury. Nonprecedential Memo Op: 344 Or App 594 (2025) 599 quotation marks omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Biggs
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-02-28· cited 3×
• State v. Dahlin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-04-16· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ulery
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2020-06-04· cited 143×
• State v. Sassarini
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-10-16· cited 18×
• State v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1971-08-26· cited 14×
• State v. Park
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-05-01· cited 13×