Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 3/14/2001
State v. Barber
Citations
- 767 A.2d 78
- 2001 R.I. LEXIS 71
- 2001 WL 259157
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the defendant’s contention that Dantzler and Jacques were inapplicable to his case because they were decided after he was sentenced
- affirming a finding of probation violation where the - 11 - violative behavior occurred while the defendant was still serving his term of imprisonment under the reasoning of Jacques
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bourcier, Flanders, Goldberg, Lederberg, Weisberger, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ross v. OregonSupreme Court· 1913-01-27· cited 138×
- Lerner v. GillSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1983-08-05· cited 72×
- Maurice R. Lerner v. Matthew Gill, Etc.First Circuit· 1985-01-04· cited 50×
- State v. DesrosiersSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1989-06-05· cited 30×
- State v. JacquesSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1989-02-03· cited 28×
- State v. GodetteSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2000-05-15· cited 28×
- State v. DantzlerSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1997-02-26· cited 13×
- State v. StudmanSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1983-12-15· cited 13×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1998-11-24· cited 10×
- Pelliccia v. SharkeySupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1972-07-10· cited 7×
- State v. BarberSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1983-11-17· cited 5×
- Lerner v. GillD. Rhode Island· 1984-01-13· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.