State v. Baptiste

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting state’s argument that defendant waived instructional claim under Kitchens and remanding case to Appellate Court, which subsequently found instructional error in State v. Baptiste, 133 Conn. App. 614, 628, 36 A.3d 697 [2012], appeal dismissed, 310 Conn. 790, 83 A.3d 591 [2014]
• no meaningful opportunity when \the trial court held only a brief charging conference and the defendant did not receive a written copy of the instructions\
• ‘‘[t]here is . . . no indication on the record that the trial court provided the defendant with an advance copy of the [charge; therefore] . . . there is simply no record that the defendant was afforded a meaningful opportunity to review the pro- posed charge’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ortiz
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2012-01-17· cited 9×
• State v. Baptiste
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2012-02-21· cited 8×
• State v. Lindsay
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2013-06-04· cited 6×
• State v. Gallo
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2012-05-15· cited 4×
• State v. Davis
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-04-22
• State v. Baptiste
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-01-21
• State v. Ruocco
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2014-07-22
• State v. Terry
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2015-12-22

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Golding
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
• State v. Kitchens
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-05· cited 242×
• State v. Collins
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-05· cited 62×
• State v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-05· cited 49×
• State v. THOMAS W.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-08-02· cited 18×
• State v. Baptiste
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-06-02· cited 8×
• State v. Baptiste
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-11-17· cited 3×