State v. Banks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the repeal of an old statute and enactment of a new statute being made effective on the same day, and the new statute increasing the penalties in some cases “clearly indicate[d] that the Legislature was acting prospectively and not retroactively”
• finding legislature intended new burglary statute to apply prospectively where it set an effective date sixty days after passage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ex Parte Mangrum
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-04-12· cited 54×
• State v. Sampson
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1980-03-31· cited 15×
• State v. Farris
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1974-05-31· cited 14×
• State of New Hampshire v. Kurt Carpentino
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2014-01-14· cited 10×
• McMichaels v. Hancock
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1970-02-27· cited 3×
• State v. Drew Fuller
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2016-06-14· cited 3×
• State v. Davies
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1981-05-07· cited 1×