Oregon Supreme Court· 2/25/2021

State v. Banks

Citations

367 Or. 574
481 P.3d 1275

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that a defendant has a “right to a verdict based solely on the evidence presented at trial”
stating that a defendant has a “right to a verdict based solely on the evidence presented at trial”
determining that the trial court’s error in overruling defendant’s objection to the state offering facts not in evidence was not harmless, in part because the trial court denied defendant’s request for a curative instruction
stating that OEC 103(3) applies to statements by lawyers
reviewing for legal error and recognizing the “basic rule” that “the state may 378 State v. Alattar not suggest that the rules of evidence prevent it from pre- senting all its evidence to the jury”
reviewing for legal error and recognizing the “basic rule” that “the state may 378 State v. Alattar not suggest that the rules of evidence prevent it from pre- senting all its evidence to the jury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duncan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.