State v. Ballard
Citations
- 122 N.C. 1024
Syllabus
<p>Bastardy Proceedings — Criminal Action — Appeal— Practice.</p> <p>1. Neither the State nor the prosecutrix is entitled to appeal in a criminal action from a verdict or finding of “not guilty.”</p> <p>2. The General Assembly having, by Sections 35 and 38 of The Code, superadded to the civil penalties attaching to bastardy the legal consequences of a crime, the proceeding is criminal in its nature.</p> <p>(Clark, J., dissents arguendo, in which Montgomery, J., concurs.)</p>
Judges: Clark, Douglas, Montgomery
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1892-02-05· cited 19×
- State Ex Rel. Davenport v. McKeeSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1887-09-05· cited 17×
- State v. . OstwaltSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1896-02-05· cited 17×
- State v. . PeeplesSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1891-02-05· cited 12×
- State v. PateSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1853-06-15· cited 8×
- State v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1853-12-05· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.