State v. Baldenegro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• jurors could have found defendant guilty as accomplice to drive-by shooting based on his having driven car from which other occupant fired gun
• jurors could have found defendant guilty as accomplice to drive-by shooting based on his having driven car from which other occupant fired gun
• “A defendant whose conduct is clearly proscribed by the core of the statute has no standing to attack the statute.”
• jurors can find the defendant “guilty as an accomplice” even if they “believed that [the defendant] drove the car and [a passenger] fired the shots”
• evidence sufficient to allow jury to \infer that [victim] acted out of fear or apprehension\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).