State v. Balcher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Board properly referred unadjudicated claim first raised to the Board to the RO for adjudication
• holding Board properly referred unadju-dicated claim first raised to the Board to the RO for adjudication
• recognizing the need for a regional office to adjudicate a pending claim later referred to it
• holding 10 unadjudicated TDIU claim before the RO because the RO failed to adjudicate a claim for TDIU as part of an informal claim for an increased rating
• noting that the filing of a NOD initiates the appeal process
• holding “that the Board did not err in referring the matter to the RO because the Board did not have appellate jurisdiction to review the veteran's claim of entitlement to benefits under section 1110 ... and lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of that claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).