Skip to main content

State v. Baker

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 669

Syllabus

After Baker entered pleas of no contest, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling his oral motion to withdraw his pleas at sentencing without a hearing. Baker's motion falls under a post-sentence standard since Baker moved to withdraw his pleas upon discovering that the trial court fully intended to impose a prison term and not community control sanctions. A manifest injustice is not demonstrated. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Donovan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.