State v. Baker
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 669
Syllabus
After Baker entered pleas of no contest, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling his oral motion to withdraw his pleas at sentencing without a hearing. Baker's motion falls under a post-sentence standard since Baker moved to withdraw his pleas upon discovering that the trial court fully intended to impose a prison term and not community control sanctions. A manifest injustice is not demonstrated. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court· 1972-10-10· cited 3,921×
- State v. XieOhio Supreme Court· 1992-02-12· cited 1,682×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1977-03-23· cited 1,253×
- State ex rel. Schneider v. KreinerOhio Supreme Court· 1998-09-23· cited 244×
- State v. SimpsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-12-02· cited 27×
- State v. BerryOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-01-17· cited 12×
- State v. DennisOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-02-23· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.