Skip to main content

State v. Baker

Citations

  • 540 So. 2d 847
  • 1989 WL 11218

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • commenting that amendment to robbery statute provides that “the force used in the course of taking property may be subsequent to the taking if the force and the act of taking 'constitute a continuous series of acts or events’ ”
  • holding trial court properly dismissed a robbery charge where the undisputed facts established that “the defendant took the property without any use of force and abandoned the property before he used force to flee from the security guards”
  • holding trial court properly dismissed a robbery charge where the undisputed facts established that “the defendant took the property without any use of force and abandoned the property before he used force to flee from the security guards”
  • legislature amended statute to repeal rule in Royal v. State, 490 So.2d 44 (Fla.1986)
  • legislative intent in amending section 812.13 was to “repeal” rule in Royal
  • the legislature's clear intent was to repeal Royal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nesbitt, Ferguson and Levy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.