State v. Baker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• sophistication and planning are elements of first degree prison escape and thus may not be used to justify an exceptional sentence
• sophistication and planning are elements of first degree prison escape and thus may not be used to justify an exceptional sentence
• planning inherent in attempted first degree escape

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Nordby
  Washington Supreme Court· 1986-08-14· cited 272×
• State v. Armstrong
  Washington Supreme Court· 1986-08-14· cited 111×
• State v. Stubbs
  Washington Supreme Court· 2010-10-07· cited 75×
• State v. Wood
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-11-04· cited 47×
• State v. Hartley
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-08-29· cited 42×
• State v. Bartlett
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-12-14· cited 19×
• State v. Pappas
  Washington Supreme Court· 2012-12-06· cited 15×
• State v. Stalker
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-10-10· cited 13×
• State v. Pockert
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1989-01-10· cited 12×
• State v. Harris
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-08-20· cited 8×
• State v. Nelson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-05-29· cited 5×
• State v. Taatjes
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-03-07· cited 5×
• State v. Fisher
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-03-04· cited 3×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Nicholson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1969-12-24· cited 39×