State v. Bailey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating the Connecticut Supreme Court’s Secondino rule, under which the failure to produce an available trial witness whom a party would naturally be expected to call warrants an adverse inference against that party.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Martinez
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-05-02· cited 32×
• Raybeck v. Danbury Orthopedic Associates, P.C.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-09-17· cited 20×
• State v. Young
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-05-09· cited 7×
• State v. Hollby
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-09-05· cited 5×
• State v. Cais
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-08-01· cited 2×
• Simon v. Navon (In Re Navon)
  D. Connecticut· 2002-09-19· cited 1×
• State v. Woods
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-07-18· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1960-11-15· cited 311×
• State v. Malave
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-09-21· cited 89×
• State v. Small
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-07-29· cited 47×
• State v. Oliver
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-04-23· cited 17×
• State v. Quinones
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-02-08· cited 14×