State v. Bailey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]his particular species of error is one that is apparent on the face of the record and, because of the unique specificity of Article I, section 11, this court has no discretion to ignore the error, once it is called to our attention.”
• “[T]his particular species of error is one that is apparent on the face of the record and, 446 State v. Krieger because of the unique specificity of Article I, section 11, this court has no discretion to ignore the error, once it is called to our attention.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Krieger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-03-23· cited 5×
• State v. Gilbert
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-02-13· cited 2×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-12-18· cited 1×
• State v. Bailey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-02-16

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Barber
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2007-12-13· cited 38×