Supreme Court of South Carolina· 10/31/1966
State v. Bailey
Citations
- 151 S.E.2d 87
- 248 S.C. 438
- 1966 S.C. LEXIS 206
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “the right of the State to estreatment of an appearance recognizance arises from contract and is, therefore, subject to the doctrine of estoppel”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moss, Lewis, Bussey, Brailsford, Legge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HollowaySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-07-02· cited 20×
- State v. McClintonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-06-19· cited 17×
- State v. BoatwrightSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-11-16· cited 16×
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-01-07· cited 6×
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-08-19· cited 2×
- Anderson County v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-05-13· cited 1×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. SquiresSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1966-08-01· cited 13×
- Bailey v. MacDougallSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1965-11-10· cited 12×
- State v. GasqueSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1962-11-09· cited 11×
- People v. RussellNew York Supreme Court· 1901-09-15· cited 8×
- Grant v. MacDougallSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1964-07-01· cited 6×
- State v. SIMRINGSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1956-08-07· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.