State v. Bailey
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 5254
Syllabus
FELONY SENTENCING — R.C. 2929.13(B)(1)(a) — PRESUMPTION OF COMMUNITY CONTROL — R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) — IMPROPER CONSIDERATIONS: The presumption in favor of community control under R.C. 2929.13(B)(1)(a) did not apply to defendant's sentences where defendant was convicted of two fifth-degree felonies and, by its terms, R.C. 2929.13(B)(1)(a) applies only if the defendant is convicted of a single fourth- or fifth-degree felony. Defendant's argument that the record does not support the trial court's findings under R.C. 2929.11(B) and 2929.12(A) fails because an appellate court cannot vacate or modify a sentence under R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) based on its view that the sentence is not supported by the record under R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12. The trial court properly considered defendant's possession of a machete during defendant's attempted burglary because that fact was relevant to the seriousness of the offense and defendant's conduct's impact on the victim.
Judges: Bock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. BryantOhio Supreme Court· 2022-06-07· cited 205×
- State v. BoswellOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-07-19· cited 15×
- State v. DurantOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-15· cited 5×
- State v. MelsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-05· cited 1×
- State v. PovedaOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-03-28· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.