State v. Bahr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• closing arguments are not evidence, and defendant’s “assertion that the State’s closing argument is relevant to his sufficiency of evidence claim fails”
• “A jury may infer such intent from the commission of acts and the surrounding circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bahr v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2023-06-28· cited 6×
• State v. Taylor
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2021-02-17
• Stubblefield v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2025-06-26

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Neder v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 5,157×
• State v. Perry
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2010-12-07· cited 531×
• State v. Severson
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2009-05-29· cited 298×
• State v. Decker
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1985-05-31· cited 274×
• State v. Knutson
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1991-11-26· cited 273×
• State v. Herrera-Brito
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1998-04-02· cited 250×
• State v. Bowman
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1993-12-17· cited 215×
• State v. Snowden
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1957-07-24· cited 52×
• State v. Reid
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2011-04-08· cited 20×
• State v. Marsh
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2004-12-28· cited 13×
• State v. Bolton
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1991-04-16· cited 12×
• State v. Richard Allen Larson
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2014-11-03· cited 8×