Missouri Court of Appeals· 6/5/1984
State v. Bachman
Citations
- 675 S.W.2d 41
- 1984 Mo. App. LEXIS 4722
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that, in the case of an SIS, “the court may, at the end of a prescribed period of probation or upon its order before the prescribed date, fully discharge the accused and no judgment of conviction is ever entered”
- explaining that a stay of imposition of a sentence and a stay of execution of a sentence “are not the same thing,” as they do not cause a trial court to continue its performance, and hence jurisdiction, in the same way
- “ ‘[I]t is manifest that the court granting probation retains continuing jurisdiction over the probationer throughout the entire period of his probation.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Manford, Lowenstein, Man-Ford, Berrey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. LynchSupreme Court of Missouri· 1984-11-20· cited 76×
- Martinez v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2000-02-01· cited 61×
- State v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals· 1986-01-07· cited 25×
- State Ex Rel. Light v. SheffieldMissouri Court of Appeals· 1989-03-09· cited 14×
- Edwards v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2007-02-23· cited 13×
- United States v. Arlando HillEighth Circuit· 2000-04-10· cited 11×
- United States v. SaizTenth Circuit· 2015-08-18· cited 11×
- R.J.L. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-11-18· cited 11×
- Finley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 1992-11-24· cited 10×
- Norfolk v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2006-04-04· cited 9×
- State v. BurkeMissouri Court of Appeals· 1990-10-16· cited 7×
- Searcy v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2003-02-11· cited 6×
- Lindsay v. HopkinsMissouri Court of Appeals· 1990-05-01· cited 6×
- Lettsome v. WaggonerVirgin Islands· 1987-08-18· cited 5×
- State v. BoykinOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-03-30· cited 5×
- State v. CannonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1985-05-28· cited 5×
- Sang Man Shin v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2009-03-26· cited 5×
- State ex rel. Fuhr v. CarrierMissouri Court of Appeals· 1989-02-10· cited 4×
- Gleason v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 1993-04-01· cited 4×
- Lettsome v. WaggonerSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 1986-07-25· cited 4×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court· 1867-01-14· cited 795×
- United States v. Duane Thomas McMainsEighth Circuit· 1976-07-30· cited 81×
- State Ex Rel. Wagner v. RuddySupreme Court of Missouri· 1979-06-27· cited 52×
- State v. BurnauSupreme Court of Missouri· 1982-12-03· cited 29×
- Guastello v. Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Missouri· 1976-05-05· cited 27×
- State Ex Rel. Peach v. TillmanMissouri Court of Appeals· 1981-03-10· cited 19×
- State Ex Rel. O'Brien v. MurphyMissouri Court of Appeals· 1979-11-27· cited 18×
- Cohen v. BARGERCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-01-25· cited 16×
- Huffman v. Department of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals· 1975-05-05· cited 12×
- Damiano v. BurgeMissouri Court of Appeals· 1972-04-24· cited 10×
- State v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1983-03-22· cited 9×
- Payless Pharmacy, Inc. v. HoffertMissouri Court of Appeals· 1979-10-09· cited 2×
- Cantrell v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 1981-10-27· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.