State v. Babb
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 2018
Syllabus
The trial court did not commit any error, plain or otherwise, by failing to aggregate and \merge\ at sentencing appellant's conviction for grand theft in violation of R.C. 2913.02(A)(2) and misuse of credit cards in violation of R.C. 2913.21(B)(2) where appellant's conduct in committing those offenses was separate and distinct. The trial court also did not commit an error requiring appellant's 18-month prison sentence to be reversed and a new sentencing hearing be had due to the trial court's failure to adhere to the requirements set forth in R.C. 2947.06(B) at sentencing as it relates to the forensic mitigation report generated in this case.
Judges: S. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 2010-12-29· cited 966×
- State v. RuffOhio Supreme Court· 2015-03-25· cited 912×
- State v. BaileyOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-14· cited 155×
- State v. DrainOhio Supreme Court· 2022-10-19· cited 40×
- State v. BrinkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2022-07-28· cited 13×
- State v. BellamyOhio Supreme Court· 2022-10-19· cited 12×
- State v. SlamkaOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-19· cited 5×
- State v. PowersOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-22· cited 5×
- State v. GibsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-01-17· cited 3×
- State v. ReidOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-14· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.