State v. Azure

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \[a] law which eliminates or delays a defendant's parole eligibility after the criminal offense has been committed is ex post facto as applied to that defendant\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Finley
  Montana Supreme Court· 1996-04-16· cited 233×
• State v. Mount
  Montana Supreme Court· 2003-10-07· cited 59×
• State v. Tracy
  Montana Supreme Court· 2005-05-26· cited 50×
• State v. Damon
  Montana Supreme Court· 2005-09-06· cited 48×
• State v. Wilson
  Montana Supreme Court· 1996-10-30· cited 39×
• State v. Moorman
  Montana Supreme Court· 1996-11-21· cited 33×
• State v. Creech
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1985-06-20· cited 25×
• State v. Beachman
  Montana Supreme Court· 1980-09-03· cited 23×
• State v. Stevens
  Montana Supreme Court· 1995-10-24· cited 12×
• Wright v. Mahoney
  Montana Supreme Court· 2003-05-19· cited 10×
• State v. Thomas
  Montana Supreme Court· 2019-07-09· cited 10×
• State v. Docken
  Montana Supreme Court· 1995-12-19· cited 7×
• State v. Frazier
  Montana Supreme Court· 2001-10-22· cited 7×
• State v. David Bullman
  Montana Supreme Court· 2007-11-06· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Greenfield v. Scafati
  D. Massachusetts· 1967-12-08· cited 99×
• State v. Gone
  Montana Supreme Court· 1978-10-29· cited 40×
• State v. Azure
  Montana Supreme Court· 1977-12-30· cited 37×
• Scafati v. Greenfield
  Supreme Court· 1968-04-22· cited 26×
• State Ex Rel. Nelson v. Ellsworth
  Montana Supreme Court· 1963-04-25· cited 12×