State v. Aydelotte

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \All courts which have considered this issue ... agree that evidence of post-entry assaults on police officers are outside the seope of the exelusionary rule.\
• “All courts . . . agree that 13 evidence of post-entry assaults on police officers are outside the scope of the 14 exclusionary rule.”
• “All courts . . . agree that evidence of post-entry assaults on police officers are outside the scope of the exclusionary rule.”
• “Evidence is inadmissible as ‘fruit of the poisonous tree’ where it has been gathered by exploitation of the original illegality.”
• “[The defendant’s] response to the police intrusion, if reasonable, may provide a defense to the charges against him. This is for the trier of fact to determine, however, not for the trial court deciding a pretrial motion to suppress.”
• “[Defendantj’s response to the police intrusion, if reasonable, may provide a defense to the charges against him. . . . This is for the trier of fact to determine, however, not for the trial court deciding a pretrial motion to suppress.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).