Skip to main content
· 4/15/2022

State v. Avonts

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 1265

Syllabus

Trial court did not exhibit bias in sentencing appellant. Imposition of 180-day sentence was not an abuse of discretion where appellant demonstrated pattern of committing OVI offenses and trial judge was concerned for safety of community.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that, during pendency of Commonwealth’s appeal from decision that defendant was not sexually dangerous, judge should consider “devising and imposing conditions of supervised probation in lieu of detention in the [tjreatment [c]enter”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Osowik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.