Skip to main content

State v. Authelet

Citations

  • 120 R.I. 42
  • 385 A.2d 642
  • 5 A.L.R. 4th 942
  • 1978 R.I. LEXIS 637

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding as long as language is inherently likely to cause average person to react violently, it is not necessary that the person who is insulted actually react
  • holding as long as language is inherently likely to cause average person to react violently, it is not necessary that the person who is insulted actually react
  • as long as the language is inherently likely to cause the average person to retaliate violently, it is not necessary that the person who is personally insulted react violently
  • courts “have invariably held the word to mean any words importing an imprecation of divine vengeance or implying divine condemnation or irreverence toward God or holy things”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bevilacqua, Doris, Joslin, Kelleher, Paolino

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.