State v. Auger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “trial court may not impose the defendant’s suspended sentences upon proof that he committed a violation- level offense” because a violation does not constitute a crime
• concluding that “trial court may not impose the defendant’s suspended sentences upon proof that he committed a violation- level offense” because a violation does not constitute a crime
• looking to RSA 265:81-a (1993) to evaluate the conduct allegedly supporting the State’s motion to impose and concluding the defendant’s conduct amounted to only a violation-level offense per the statute
• looking to RSA 265:81-a (1993) to evaluate the conduct allegedly supporting the State’s motion to impose and concluding the defendant’s conduct amounted to only a violation-level offense per the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Kelly
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2009-11-17· cited 12×
• State v. Laryssa J. Benner
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2019-05-17· cited 5×
• State of New Hampshire v. Bryan Weston Luikart
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2021-05-04
• William v. State NH
  D. New Hampshire· 2011-07-06

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Budgett
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2001-03-16· cited 17×
• Trovato v. Deveau
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1999-04-21· cited 12×
• State v. Dery
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1991-07-03· cited 6×
• State v. Graham
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2001-03-16· cited 5×
• State v. Palermo
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2001-03-16· cited 2×