Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 6/17/1971
State v. Aucoin
Citations
- 278 A.2d 395
- 1971 Me. LEXIS 226
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “No person shall loiter in, on, or adjacent to any street, ways, or public places, in the City of Portland. . .”
- “No person shallloiter in, on, or adjacent to any street, ways, or public places, in the City of Portland . . . ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dufresne, Web-Ber, Weatherbee, Pomeroy, Wernick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1988-08-22· cited 76×
- Shapiro Bros. Shoe Co. v. Lewiston-Auburn Shoeworkers Protective Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1974-05-28· cited 56×
- S S v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1973-01-22· cited 13×
- State v. FalconeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2006-07-27· cited 7×
- State v. DenisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1973-04-25· cited 6×
- State v. SylvainSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1975-09-29· cited 4×
- State v. BoisvertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1975-11-21· cited 4×
- City of Cincinnati v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court· 1973-11-21· cited 3×
- State v. ReedSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1975-10-14· cited 1×
- Commonwealth v. SperawBerks County Court of Common Pleas· 1983-04-02
- Commonwealth v. SperawBerks County Court of Common Pleas· 1983-04-20
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.