Skip to main content

State v. Attwood

Citations

  • 294 S.W.3d 144
  • 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1445
  • 2009 WL 3301607

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the defendant’s secondary argument that his armed criminal action conviction must also be reversed if the appellate court reversed its related conviction was moot because his underlying conviction was affirmed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Daniel E. Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.