Skip to main content
· 2/10/2023

State v. Assefa

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 385

Syllabus

OVI – PROBABLE CAUSE – EVIDENCE – MANIFEST WEIGHT – SUFFICIENCY: The trial court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress evidence stemming from a warrantless arrest where the arresting officer had probable cause to believe that defendant was under the influence of alcohol based on defendant's physiological indicia, combative demeanor, colliding with a parked car, and refusal to submit to sobriety testing. Defendant's OVI conviction was based on sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the trial court based its finding of guilt on credible testimony of the arresting officer and body-worn-camera video that supported the conclusion that defendant's driving was appreciably impaired by alcohol.

Judges: Crouse

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.