State v. Asprilla

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a trademark infringement case is “exceptional” and justifies the award of reasonable a attorney’s fee if defendants infringement was malicious, fraudulent, deliberate, and wilful
• “memorandum of law” filed subsequent to court order treated as a “motion under Rule 2-535(a) to revise the judgment”
• counsel ineffective for failure to call witnesses to support only plausible defense of self-defense
• reviewing authorized grounds for habeas corpus relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).