State v. Arwood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Article III request valid when prisoner only sent it to the court, but there was evidence in the record that the prosecutor eventually received the request
• “[something more than [the defendant’s] mere silence at arraignment [when a trial date was set outside the 180-day period] must serve to belie his earlier intention”
• [W]here the “[defendant had asserted his statutory demand for trial within 180 days [under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers],” “[s]omething more than his mere silence at arraignment [when a trial date was set outside the 180-day period] must serve to belie his earlier intention”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).