Arizona Supreme Court· 9/6/1974

State v. Arredondo

Citations

526 P.2d 163
111 Ariz. 141
1974 Ariz. LEXIS 380

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that references to a defendant’s failure to testify cannot be charged to the state when they are first made by the defense
stating that comment on defendant’s failure to testify is normally fundamental error
“[T]he remarks of the prosecutor did not go beyond a pertinent reply and were not prejudicial.”
prosecutor’s argument that “everything the officers have said” is “uncontroverted, uncontested” not improper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holohan, Cameron, Hays, Struckmeyér, Lockwood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.