State v. Arnston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a relator’s complaint is “based on” public disclosures where the complaint “describe[s] allegations or transactions substantially similar to those in the public domain”
• advising that “there is no requirement ... that the relevant public disclosures irrefutably prove a case of fraud. It is sufficient that the ‘publicly disclosed transaction is sufficient to raise the inference of fraud’ ”
• “express[ing] no opinion on [the] merits” because dismissal was proper under Rule 12(b)(1) such that the court need not address the 12(b)(6) challenge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).