Ohio Court of Appeals· 9/9/2022

State v. Arnold

Citations

2022 Ohio 3147

Syllabus

R.C. 2917.21(B)(1) – TELECOMMUNICATIONS HARASSMENT – EVIDENCE: Defendant's conviction for telecommunications harassment was not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the evidence showed that, while the initial purpose of the telephone calls was to retrieve his son, his purpose shifted to threatening or harassing the victim into changing her mind once she refused to give him their son.

Judges: Zayas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Thompkins
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
State v. Powell
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-02· cited 56×
State v. Cress
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-12-27· cited 55×
State v. Ellison
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2008-10-10· cited 30×
State v. Combs
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-22· cited 10×
In re C.W.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-20· cited 9×
State v. Harshbarger
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2010-09-20· cited 4×
State v. Ham
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-28· cited 2×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.