Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 7/24/1991

State v. Arnold

Citations

  • 61 Ohio St. 3d 175
  • 573 N.E.2d 1079
  • 1991 Ohio LEXIS 1747

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the rule of lenity “applies only where there is ambiguity in or conflict between the statutes.”
  • “ ‘rule of lenity’ applies only where there is ambiguity in or conflict between * * * statutes”
  • “[w]hile we are required to strictly construe statutes defining criminal penalties against the state, see R.C. 2901.04(A), this ‘rule of lenity’ applies only where there is ambiguity in or conflict between the statutes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.