Court of Appeals of Arizona· 11/12/1975
State v. Arnold
Citations
- 25 Ariz. App. 199
- 542 P.2d 37
- 1975 Ariz. App. LEXIS 843
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial court should not be required, sua sponte, to instruct on lesser-included offenses because defense strategy may be to secure a complete acquittal
- trial court should not be required, sua sponte, to instruct on lesser-included offenses because defense strategy may be to secure a complete acquittal
- trial court should not be required, sua sponte, to instruct on lesser-included offenses because defense strategy may be to secure a complete acquittal
- trial court should not be required, sua sponte , to instruct on lesser-included offenses because defense strategy may be to secure a complete acquittal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Department, Donofrio, Froeb, Ogg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.