Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/18/2021

State v. Arnold

Citations

2021 Ohio 2836

Syllabus

SENTENCING – ACTUAL VINDICTIVENESS – R.C. 2929.12: The record did not clearly and convincingly support a finding that the trial court acted with actual vindictiveness when imposing a sentence after trial that was harsher than the sentence offered during plea negotiations. The defendant failed to affirmatively demonstrate that the trial court imposed sentence without considering the purposes of sentencing in R.C. 2929.12.

Judges: Myers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Vannatter
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-24
State v. Cannon
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-12-23

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
State v. White
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-09-27· cited 118×
State v. Rahab (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-04-18· cited 111×
State v. Anderson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-02-03· cited 5×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.