State v. Arnold

Citations

• 2018 Ohio 3394

Syllabus

Trial judge did not err in denying Appellant's Crim.R. 29 motion on charges of rape, unlawful sexual conduct with a minor, and gross sexual imposition where State presented sufficient evidence of both penetration and force or threat of force. Consideration of the same credible evidence demonstrates that verdicts finding Appellant guilty of those charges were not against manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed.