Skip to main content

State v. Arnold

Citations

  • 421 A.2d 932
  • 1980 Me. LEXIS 692

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that opinion testimony was inadmissible to prove a person’s character or character trait when Maine Rule of Evidence 405 permitted only evidence of reputation or specific instances of conduct
  • holding that opinion testimony was inadmissible to prove a person’s character or character trait when Maine Rule of Evidence 405 permitted only evidence of reputation or specific instances of conduct
  • same ■conclusion reached regarding head and facial hair, bloodstained clothing, and watchband

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wernick, McKusick, Wer-Nick, Godfrey, Nichols, Glass-Man, Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.