State v. Arnold

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that owner’s testimony about price of property purchased two years before theft and jury’s physical observation of property “constituted a substantial compliance with the statute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Clipper
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-10-04· cited 16×
• Herme v. State
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-03-25· cited 12×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chimel v. California
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
• Williams v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 659×
• State v. Spreigl
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-12-17· cited 368×
• State v. Bagley
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1970-02-20· cited 30×
• Freeman v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1972-01-07· cited 1×