State v. Arnold
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 2547
Syllabus
Judge Zmuda, writing for the majority, affirms the judgment of the trial court, finding nothing in the record to support the claim that the defendant suffered from insanity at the time of the offenses for which the trial court entered convictions, where defendant entered a guilty plea to three charges in return for dismissal of an earlier case and 29 charges in the present case, negotiated through trial counsel after restoration to competency.
Judges: Zmuda
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1971-03-02· cited 3,052×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1985-05-15· cited 1,185×
- Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1992-06-22· cited 1,180×
- State v. KelleyOhio Supreme Court· 1991-01-30· cited 437×
- State v. SpatesOhio Supreme Court· 1992-08-05· cited 321×
- State v. Harris (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-01-22· cited 151×
- State v. Beasley (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-01-04· cited 133×
- McCrone v. Bank One Corp.Ohio Supreme Court· 2005-12-28· cited 106×
- State v. SwazeyOhio Supreme Court· 2023-12-22· cited 10×
- State v. BurkeOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-16· cited 9×
- State v. WillisOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-08· cited 9×
- State v. WalkerOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-01-18· cited 9×
- State v. SnellOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-03-22· cited 4×
- State v. GaethOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-19· cited 3×
- State v. HesserOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-03-07· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.