Ohio Court of Appeals· 9/13/2024
State v. Arnold
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 4503
Syllabus
Although appellant's prison sentence is significantly longer than the prison term imposed on his codefendant, the record does not demonstrate that the trial court failed to consider the purposes of felony sentencing set forth in R.C. 2929.11(B). Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 3,571×
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. ArnettOhio Supreme Court· 2000-03-15· cited 630×
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court· 2011-06-08· cited 355×
- State v. WithrowOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-06· cited 72×
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-20· cited 36×
- State v. MurphyOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-19· cited 29×
- State v. HaddadOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-04-06· cited 15×
- State v. DodsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-15· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.