Missouri Court of Appeals· 8/23/1963
State v. Arnett
Citations
- 370 S.W.2d 169
- 1963 Mo. App. LEXIS 485
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \One who is accused of stealing a fat hog should not be permitted to complain because the hog was lean.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ruark, Stone, Hogan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals· 1984-07-31· cited 26×
- Hart v. HartMissouri Court of Appeals· 1976-07-06· cited 26×
- University City v. Diveley Auto Body CompanySupreme Court of Missouri· 1967-06-12· cited 15×
- State v. DegraffenreidMissouri Court of Appeals· 1994-05-31· cited 10×
- State v. NicholsMissouri Court of Appeals· 1987-03-17· cited 9×
- Nelke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1986-12-10· cited 9×
- State v. CoeMissouri Court of Appeals· 2007-09-19· cited 8×
- In Interest of RASMissouri Court of Appeals· 1992-03-17· cited 8×
- State v. NelsonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1971-02-01· cited 7×
- Juvenile Officer v. D.A.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1992-03-17· cited 5×
- State v. WickizerMissouri Court of Appeals· 1978-02-27· cited 2×
- State of Missouri v. Mark Lindell MartinMissouri Court of Appeals· 2019-05-21
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.