Missouri Court of Appeals· 7/1/1994
State v. Arndt
Citations
- 881 S.W.2d 634
- 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1098
- 1994 WL 319565
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the criminal defendant did not prove a denial of due process because he made no showing that the police officers acted in bad faith when they “re-blued” the pistol he used to kill his wife before he had a chance to retest the weapon
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Crow, Flanigan, Prewitt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
- State v. GrimSupreme Court of Missouri· 1993-05-25· cited 551×
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 1991-07-23· cited 184×
- State v. HamiltonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1990-05-09· cited 48×
- Tatum v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 1985-07-01· cited 29×
- State v. LittleSupreme Court of Missouri· 1984-07-17· cited 29×
- State v. CulkinMissouri Court of Appeals· 1990-05-09· cited 27×
- State v. ShawMissouri Court of Appeals· 1980-06-24· cited 18×
- Bryant v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 1980-08-04· cited 18×
- State v. WilliamsonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1992-07-14· cited 13×
- State v. RichardMissouri Court of Appeals· 1990-09-25· cited 8×
- State v. MorrisMissouri Court of Appeals· 1992-12-08· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.