State v. Armstrong

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reasonable medical expenses to treat injuries suffered by a police officer when attempting to apprehend the defendant, who was convicted of the crime of escape, were a direct result of the escape
• noting that “a defendant may be held liable for economic losses directly resulting from the factual allegations that support the conduct covered by the conviction”
• defendant may be held liable for economic losses directly resulting from factual allegations that support the conduct covered by the conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of New Hampshire v. Louise E. Pinault
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2015-07-15· cited 32×
• State v. Lopez
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2007-09-21· cited 8×
• State v. Schwartz
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2010-04-08· cited 5×
• State of New Hampshire v. Karen Folley
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2020-01-10
• State of New Hampshire v. Matthew Gedney
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2021-10-08

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Close v. Fisette
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2001-06-11· cited 13×
• State v. Eno
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1999-04-08· cited 9×
• State v. McCarthy
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-12-29· cited 5×