State v. Ardell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Fourteenth Amendment due process right applies only to government entities whose action may be fairly attributed to the State
• holding there was pervasive entwinement because the library received “pervasive public funding” and the town controlled “one-half of its governing board”
• noting that a “predominance of public funding” is not conclusive proof of state action
• noting that a “predominance of public funding” is not conclusive proof of state action
• noting that a “predominance of public funding” is not conclusive proof of state action
• determining that “the Library was created by a special act of the Connecticut State legislature and there is no doubt that the provision of library services is a legitimate statutory objective” and holding that “the Lebrón standard has been satisfied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).